When a Missouri homeowner files a property damage claim, the conversation almost always arrives at the same point: the insurance company presents an estimate from their estimating software and treats that number as the settlement. Many policyholders accept it, believing they have no choice. That belief is wrong — and it may be costing Missouri homeowners thousands of dollars on every claim.
What the Policy Says
Most homeowner insurance policies are written as indemnity contracts. The insurer’s obligation is to restore the insured property to its pre-loss condition — not to whatever a software program estimates, and not to a regional database average. The policy does not say the insurance company gets to decide how much restoration should cost. It says the policyholder is entitled to the cost of actual restoration. Those are two very different things.
The Policyholder’s Burden
The policy imposes the burden of proof on the insured. You must document the damage, establish the scope of repairs, and substantiate the cost. A policyholder who disputes the insurance company’s number without supporting documentation is unlikely to prevail.
But the burden cuts both ways. Once the policyholder presents credible, documented evidence of the actual cost to restore the property — through contractor estimates, material invoices, or expert evaluation — the insurance company cannot simply ignore that evidence and retreat to their software output. The policy obligates them to pay the actual cost of restoration. If they refuse, they are not meeting their contractual obligation.
Where the Software Problem Begins
Most insurance companies use estimating software that draws on regional databases of labor rates and material costs to generate repair estimates. Used correctly, these are a reasonable starting point. The problem arises when insurers treat the software figure as a ceiling — a maximum payment regardless of what a licensed contractor actually charges. When real bids exceed the software output, policyholders are told that reality is wrong and the computer is right. That position is not defensible under the policy.
A Problem the Insurance Companies Don’t Advertise
The major estimating software platforms are licensed products. Insurance companies use them under agreements with the software developers that define how they may be used. Estimating software is designed and licensed as a tool to help determine repair scope and cost — not as a contractual ceiling on what an insurer will pay.
When an insurance company uses the software as a payment cap, refusing to pay actual costs that exceed the software’s output, they may be using that product in a manner that contradicts the terms of their license agreement. This is a recognized issue in the insurance claims industry and has been the subject of litigation and regulatory scrutiny.
What This Means for Missouri Policyholders
If your insurer has told you that your settlement is limited to their software estimate, understand two things. First, that number is not necessarily what your policy entitles you to. Second, the insurer’s use of that number as a ceiling may not be consistent with either the policy they issued or the terms under which they are permitted to use the software.
The measure of your settlement is the actual, documented cost to restore your property to its pre-loss condition. That is what you paid for. That is what the contract requires. If the software printout doesn’t get you there, it is not the final word.
James H. Bushart, Licensed Missouri Public Adjuster
MO License #8207067 | SCLA | NAPIA
314-803-2167 | missouripublicadjuster.org
Share this:
Pingback: Hail Damage Insurance Claim Missouri - James H. Bushart